Agree with this. UC beating X this year didn't do much for them this year. If X was its normal self this year, that win may have pushed UC to a higher seed. I hate losing to UC, but competitive games, with two high caliber teams is much more fun then beating up on a bad team, even if it means an occasional L.muskieman wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:25 amYou would rather have a poor coach for UC? Not me. I want this to be a competitive game where each team improves the other and the game is worth playing based on Quad 1 games. Beating a poor uc team never helps improve a Xavier team but beating a #1 is a chest beater game. You always complain when X plays the lower tier teams so UC as a quality opponent should be encouraged.Xavier2005 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:48 pmSince some to many X fans made fun of Cronin and his coaching abilities, maybe those X fans should start worrying that UC may get a better coach, who might start a major winning streak against X. Always be careful what you wish for??? Having Cronin was good for X's wins against UC . The new coach might reverse that??? Time will tell.
Mick Cronin to UCLA
-
titansbaseball01
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
-
bluegrass
- Posts: 3411
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:32 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
I have to think the fan base out there is pretty underwhelmed by this hiring. Any connection to Magic resigning? 
-
thecoach
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:52 am
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
I talked to a guy today who's pretty knowledgeable who said they're interested in a couple well placed experienced assistants at big programs. The a.d. hit the jackpot with Fickell so probably not a stretch. Another indication in today's age of college sports recruiting is priority 1.Xavier2005 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:48 pmSince some to many X fans made fun of Cronin and his coaching abilities, maybe those X fans should start worrying that UC may get a better coach, who might start a major winning streak against X. Always be careful what you wish for??? Having Cronin was good for X's wins against UC . The new coach might reverse that??? Time will tell.
- muskieman
- Posts: 26735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
Maybe AD should have checked this out.Anti-Homer wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:17 pmCronin is the only guy who makes north of 1.0 million annually (at the same school), and has only advanced to the Sw 16 once in 16 years as a HC. In all fairness, he took over a program in shambles at the Univ of Clifton Heights Avondale, so I’ll say once in 13 years. Same dubious distinction applies. I saw this nugget from an article trying to extol the great accomplishments of UCLA’s new hire:
“Cronin has become one of just six coaches in the nation to have led his program to the NCAA Tournament the last nine seasons. Joining him in that group are Mark Few (Gonzaga), Tom Izzo (Michigan State), Mike Krzyzewski (Duke), Bill Self (Kansas) and Roy Williams (North Carolina).” They failed to mention that most of his success was achieved in mid-major leagues, where they play half a dozen top 50 teams a year. This year was a nice anomaly for them, but didn’t lead to a different outcome in the tourney. Here's a trivia question: Of the former group, there is only one coach who has not won more than 20 games in the tourney in the last thirteen years, and same said coach has only been to the Sw 16 once. Hint: It ain’t Coach K.
I also love this delusional quote from the AD: ““This is a top-tier basketball job for the right coach,” Bohn said. If by right coach, you mean someone who wants to play in a mid-major league with a lukewarm fanbase (this year being an exception) and who has a legacy of underachievement in the last decade. I can’t blame him. He has to sell the program. UC’s gain is Xavier’s loss. The only campus more riotous in joy than VA right now is UC’s.
Steve Alford made as many Sweet 16 appearances in four seasons of coaching at Southwest Missouri State as Mick Cronin made in 13 years at Cincinnati.
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
-
True_Blue
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
X plays about 30 games per year. Let the other games be high caliber.titansbaseball01 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:36 amAgree with this. UC beating X this year didn't do much for them this year. If X was its normal self this year, that win may have pushed UC to a higher seed. I hate losing to UC, but competitive games, with two high caliber teams is much more fun then beating up on a bad team, even if it means an occasional L.muskieman wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:25 amYou would rather have a poor coach for UC? Not me. I want this to be a competitive game where each team improves the other and the game is worth playing based on Quad 1 games. Beating a poor uc team never helps improve a Xavier team but beating a #1 is a chest beater game. You always complain when X plays the lower tier teams so UC as a quality opponent should be encouraged.Xavier2005 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:48 pmSince some to many X fans made fun of Cronin and his coaching abilities, maybe those X fans should start worrying that UC may get a better coach, who might start a major winning streak against X. Always be careful what you wish for??? Having Cronin was good for X's wins against UC . The new coach might reverse that??? Time will tell.
For the Shootout, I want XU to beat uc by 40+ points every damn year. To me that would be very entertaining and fun.
Realistic? Hell no. But that is what I want. You should too!
- muskieman
- Posts: 26735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
I didn't say I would be sad to beat them every year and by 40 doesn't sound bad especially when they are ranked.True_Blue wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:35 pmX plays about 30 games per year. Let the other games be high caliber.titansbaseball01 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:36 amAgree with this. UC beating X this year didn't do much for them this year. If X was its normal self this year, that win may have pushed UC to a higher seed. I hate losing to UC, but competitive games, with two high caliber teams is much more fun then beating up on a bad team, even if it means an occasional L.muskieman wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:25 am
You would rather have a poor coach for UC? Not me. I want this to be a competitive game where each team improves the other and the game is worth playing based on Quad 1 games. Beating a poor uc team never helps improve a Xavier team but beating a #1 is a chest beater game. You always complain when X plays the lower tier teams so UC as a quality opponent should be encouraged.
For the Shootout, I want XU to beat uc by 40+ points every damn year. To me that would be very entertaining and fun.
Realistic? Hell no. But that is what I want. You should too!![]()
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
-
Anti-Homer
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
Please let it be Van Exel or Erik Martin. I would have even been happy with Frank Martin as well. He went to a FF, and did a great job that year, but his overall resume as a HC has been underwhelming. I don't want it to be the guy I think it ultimately will: John Brannen. He is a good coach and a good guy. However, the fact that Bohn has hired a search firm indicates a Brannen hire would be like Cronin's: 9th or 10th on the dance card.
I guess Bohn's claim that it is an elite job isn't shared by the very good - elite coaches.
I guess Bohn's claim that it is an elite job isn't shared by the very good - elite coaches.
-
sweet67
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 9:55 am
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
Bohn didnt hire a search firm.Anti-Homer wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:58 pmPlease let it be Van Exel or Erik Martin. I would have even been happy with Frank Martin as well. He went to a FF, and did a great job that year, but his overall resume as a HC has been underwhelming. I don't want it to be the guy I think it ultimately will: John Brannen. He is a good coach and a good guy. However, the fact that Bohn has hired a search firm indicates a Brannen hire would be like Cronin's: 9th or 10th on the dance card.
I guess Bohn's claim that it is an elite job isn't shared by the very good - elite coaches.
Brannen was at the top of list since Day 1.
Great call AH.
-
Anti-Homer
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
Yea,sweet67 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 6:07 pmBohn didnt hire a search firm.Anti-Homer wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:58 pmPlease let it be Van Exel or Erik Martin. I would have even been happy with Frank Martin as well. He went to a FF, and did a great job that year, but his overall resume as a HC has been underwhelming. I don't want it to be the guy I think it ultimately will: John Brannen. He is a good coach and a good guy. However, the fact that Bohn has hired a search firm indicates a Brannen hire would be like Cronin's: 9th or 10th on the dance card.
I guess Bohn's claim that it is an elite job isn't shared by the very good - elite coaches.
Brannen was at the top of list since Day 1.
Great call AH.
That's why Frank Martin was being reported as the primary target by every rag, including the Enquirer to interview for the "elite job" since 113 (my new nickname for Mick) left for the coast before the boosters ran him out. I guess your next claim is Cronin was UCLA's 1st choice too, but Guerrero was waiting to woo him until seeing if the Lakers would offer him their job 1st.
Sweets, isn't it time for you to stalk the Facebooks of those bullies in high school, to see if they are posting things in code about you again?
- muskieman
- Posts: 26735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mick Cronin to UCLA
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
Return to “Xavier Men's Basketball”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests
