Page 1 of 1
UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:33 am
by rickf
Should be all the motivation they need. As if they needed anymore motvation.
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:10 pm
by Mr. Neutral
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:13 pm
by muskeez
That and L'ville -2.5 are the ones that stick out.
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:16 pm
by LyonsIsFlyin
I liked our chances before hearing this, now I like em even more. Wonder if the Hammer has a thought on this? haha
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:49 pm
by Il Saggio
If you don't like the point spread, blame it on the Sagarin computerized ranking system, because that's exactly where it come from--specifically, from the PREDICTOR column. The exact same thing is true for Louisville-Tennessee.
Do the arithmetic and you'll get exactly the published point spreads. The RPI has Xavier ahead of WVU, but Sagarin's Predictor has WVU ahead. WVU has a much better record vs. Sagarin (not RPI) 50 than does Xavier.
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:03 pm
by Shadow
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:07 pm
by Il Saggio
Thanks.
Do you not see, in the predictor column (far righthand side of the grid), that WVU is rated two points higher than Xavier?
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:45 pm
by xavierj
I don't care what the spread is because Xavier will not lose to WVU for 5 reasons: 1. Xavier has better players, 2. Xavier has a better coach, 3. Xavier shoots the ball better, 4. Xavier rebounds better and 5. Xavier plays better defense. Xavier 79 WVU 64.
Re: UNDERDOG
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:49 pm
by Il Saggio
xavierj wrote:I don't care what the spread is because Xavier will not lose to WVU for 5 reasons: 1. Xavier has better players, 2. Xavier has a better coach, 3. Xavier shoots the ball better, 4. Xavier rebounds better and 5. Xavier plays better defense. Xavier 79 WVU 64.
Sounds right to me.